Golden Era for US Billionaires: How the Economic Structure Perpetuates Income Disparity
For many Americans, the financial landscape over the past five years has been difficult. Costs have skyrocketed while pay remains flat. High mortgage rates have made buying a home a bleak prospect. The rate of unemployment has been gradually increasing.
Many Americans have indicated they're putting off major life decisions, including having kids or moving to new employment, because of economic uncertainty. But for a select few of people, the past five-year period couldn't have been more successful.
The Billionaire Boom
The fortune of the world's billionaires increased 54% in 2020, at the height of the pandemic. And even during all the economic instability, the stock market has only persisted in expanding. This growth has largely benefited just a tiny percentage of Americans: 10% of the population controls 93% of stock market wealth.
Despite the imbalance as this distribution seems, it's the financial structure working as it is existing today.
"Affluent individuals have bought their jets, they've purchased their multiple houses and mansions, but now they're securing senators and media outlets," commented inequality researcher Chuck Collins. "We're now stepping into this other chapter of maximum resource removal where the wealthy are taking advantage of the system of inequality."
Understanding Wealth Tiers
To help others understand what exactly it means to be "rich" in the US, Collins adopts a concept from journalist Robert Frank who, in a 2007 book on the rich, conceptualized the different levels of wealth as "Richistan" villages: Prosperity Village, Lower Richistan, Middle Richistan, Upper Richistan and Billionaireville.
To modernize the concept, Collins categorizes these "wealth villages" based on income levels:
- At the foundation, Affluent Town, are the 10 million Americans who have a household income of at least $110,000 and an net worth of over $1.5m.
- The villages get more select as wealth goes up: Lower Richistan has 2.6 million households who have wealth between $6m and $13m.
- Middle Richistan has 1.3 million households who have assets worth an average of $37m.
- Upper Richistan, made up of 130,000 Americans (roughly the size of a small city) has between $60m to $1bn in wealth.
Altogether, the residents of these villages constitute the top 10% of the wealth income distribution, about 14 million Americans altogether, though their experiences vary dramatically.
"You could be in Lower Richistan, and you're still flying in the coach section of a commercial plane," Collins explained. "Whereas in Upper Richistan, you're traveling via a private jet. That's a really distinct lifestyle. You fly private, you have no stakes in the commercial aviation system. You don't care if the whole system fails – you're set."
The Billionaireville Effect
The peak in "Richistan" is Billionaireville, which is made up of about 800 American billionaires who are some of the world's richest. The influence that this group has far surpasses those who are simply well-off, let alone the ordinary person who doesn't reside in "Richistan" at all.
But Collins thinks the progressive slogan "end extreme wealth" fails to address the core issue and has a "suggestion of eradication" to it.
"It's the distinction between personal actions and a system of rules," Collins said. "We should be focused on an economic system that channels so much wealth upward to the billionaires."
Fortune Building Strategies
To understand how wealth at the billionaire level works, Collins breaks it down into four parts: acquiring fortune, protecting assets, policy control and maximum resource extraction.
When many Americans think about wealth, they usually think exclusively about the first step, Collins said. People can create a reasonable quantity of wealth through establishing or managing a successful business, which could get them admission in Affluent Town.
But getting to Billionaireville requires substantial commitment and strategy in those next three steps. Collins describes what he calls the "asset protection sector": the tax lawyers, accountants and wealth managers who use their expertise to ensure that the super rich are being calculated about their taxes.
"Wealth defense professionals use a extensive selection of tools such as legal entities, international accounts, anonymous shell companies, non-profit organizations and other methods to hold assets," he explains.
Government Power and Extreme Wealth Removal
To advance a wealth defense strategy, a family needs government backing. Wealth of over $40m translates to political power, Collins says, and can be used to protect assets and protect its accumulation.
The ultimate step is a different kind of wealth accumulation, one that Collins calls "maximum taking" to describe how the wealthy have come to affect nearly every single part of an Americans' routine activities largely through private equity, which allows wealthy individuals to support private companies.
"Private equity is seeking those corners of the economy where they can increase profits a little bit harder," Collins said. "One thing I don't think people realize is these billionaire private-equity funds are what happens when so much wealth is parked in so few hands, and they can essentially pivot and say, 'Where else can we extract profits out of the economy?' Healthcare? Great. Mobile home parks? These people can't go anywhere, [so] you can raise their rents."
Tangible Effects
The results of this inequality go beyond the wealth getting wealthier. It's about people paying more for their healthcare, rent and vet bills without seeing any significant salary growth. And Collins said the pain and frustration of this kind of society can lead to deep discontent.
"The most powerful wealthy elites understand people are being left behind [and] are financially struggling," Collins said, adding that right-leaning leaders have been good at tapping into a potent "fake grassroots movement".
Government Truth
The contradiction, Collins points out in his book, is that elected representatives have appointed a string of billionaires to cabinet positions. Along with tech billionaires who had short yet influential roles overseeing significant decreases to the federal workforce, other important roles for commerce, treasury, education and the interior are also all billionaires.
This political landscape, along with help from legislative supporters, helped pass huge tax bills, which will make enduring decreases for the wealthy and corporations.
Future Solutions
While legislative bodies continue to argue that border policies and bad trade agreements are the source of everyone's economic problems, "the challenge is: Will the other major party, which has also been captured by the billionaires and big money, be able to meaningfully address the underlying harms?" Collins said.
Progressive politicians, he argues, know what policies are needed to "change wealth distribution", including deep changes to the tax system, increasing the minimum wage and empowering worker groups.
"It was so, so close, and the law really did represent the will of the most of people who really want lawmakers to fix some of these pressing issues," Collins said. "Elite control is not about developing so much as preventing. It's easier to block than it is to make something substantial take place, but the muscle memory is there. We know what that looks like."
Collins is hopeful that there can be change, but said it would require continuous government action.
"It may be quickly that the pendulum swings back, and then it really is about maintaining a sustained really popular movement to make progress on this extreme inequality we're living in," he said. "We can address this. It is addressable."